SR&ED Tax Credits for
Robotics & Mechatronics
Deploying standard industrial robots isn't SR&ED, but engineering autonomous navigation for dynamic environments is. We translate your sensor fusion, ROS nodes, and kinematic simulations into audit-proof claims, letting your team focus on building, not reporting.
Your R&D in [
Manufacturing
]
Our expertise. Zero anxiety.
Your R&D in
[
Manufacturing
]
Our expertise. Zero anxiety.
What may qualify in robotics & mechatronics
We turn complex Robotics & Mechatronics work into a defensible SR&ED claim with clear evidence and clean scope.
(examples)
(Evidence to capture)
01
Developing autonomous navigation (SLAM) for GPS-denied environments
Path planning logs, sensor fusion schemas, localization error data.
02
Engineering custom end-of-arm tooling (EOAT) for fragile materials
CAD iterations, pressure sensor logs, material failure analyses.
03
Optimizing real-time kinematic (RTK) systems for high-speed precision
Latency benchmarks, motor torque logs, control loop tuning data.
04
Implementing AI-driven computer vision for object recognition and sorting
Training datasets, inference speed logs, accuracy/error rate reports.
05
Human-Robot Collaboration (Cobots) with novel safety protocols
Force-limit testing, sensor response logs, risk assessment iterations.
Do you qualify?
A quick self-check
This is some text inside of a div block.
You’re more likely to qualify if your work has all three:
01
Technological Uncertainty
You couldn't predict if the robot would navigate safely, maintain precision under load, or integrate with legacy systems due to environmental or hardware constraints.
02
Systematic Investigation
You ran simulations (Gazebo/Unity), tested multiple sensor configurations, iterated on control algorithms, and logged real-world performance data.
03
Technological Advancement
You achieved a measurable improvement in autonomy, cycle time, precision, or safety that goes beyond standard robotic integrations.
We help you capture:
You don’t need perfect paperwork. You need a consistent evidence trail.
What problem you were solving
[ uncertainty ]
What problem you were solving
[ uncertainty ]
What problem you were solving
[ uncertainty ]
Our technical specialists speak your language.
Whether you are architecting a cloud database, scaling a bioreactor, or overcoming mechanical failure, we understand your underlying constraints without needing a beginner's explanation.
[ uncertainty ]
What problem you were solving
[ uncertainty ]
What problem you were solving
[ uncertainty ]
Routine installation of off-the-shelf robots does not qualify — unless you can show specific technological uncertainty and documented testing.
[ Not sure if your work fits? ]
Request consultation
Request consultation
Common pitfalls we help you avoid
Small fixes early can prevent big issues later.
Integration vs. R&D
Bolting a robot to a floor is routine. We help isolate the specific engineering hours spent writing custom ROS nodes or designing complex communication bridges between the robot and the factory PLC.
The "Off-the-shelf" Fallacy
Using a UR or KUKA robot is standard. The SR&ED claim lies in the custom work required when the robot's built-in software fails to solve your unique, high-precision task.
Simulation vs. Reality
"It worked in the sim but failed in the field." This "reality gap" is the perfect evidence for SR&ED. We help you document the technical pivots required to make your robot function in the physical world.
Software / Hardware Blame
Robotics is a team sport. We ensure that both the firmware/software work and the mechanical/electrical modifications are captured, maximizing the claim across all engineering disciplines.
Want to sanity-check your setup?
Request consultation
Request consultation
Your R&D in
[
Manufacturing
]
Our expertise. Zero anxiety.
How Checkpoint helps robotics & mechatronics teams with SR&ED
We turn real robotics & mechatronics innovation into a clear SR&ED claim with evidence CRA can understand—without unnecessary complexity.
[ step 01 ]
Entry consultation
A brief, technical conversation to understand your operations to determine your SR&ED potential. No preparation needed.
[ step 02 ]
Eligibility review
We analyze your technical landscape to separate routine engineering from eligible work, identifying your hidden ROI.
[ step 03 ]
Technical discovery
We identify potential SR&ED projects from your work, and translate them into CRA-compliant language. Your team stays focused on innovation, not paperwork.
[ step 04 ]
Claim Preparation & Submission
We identify eligible project costs, draft the SR&ED forms, and develop a technical narrative for the CRA. We then coordinate with your tax advisor to manage the final submission.
[ step 05 ]
Proactive Compliance
Say goodbye to the year-end scramble. We establish a recurring rhythm of monthly or quarterly check-ins to capture eligible activities and costs as they happen.
[ step 06 ]
CRA Audit and Review Defense
We don’t just submit and disappear. We provide expert technical defense and manage all CRA communications to protect your claim.
[ step 07 ]
Funding Secured
Once your claim is approved, we provide a detailed reconciliation of the funding secured. We operate on a success-fee basis—we win only when you win.
What evidence
matters most
This is some text inside of a div block.
(and how we keep it simple)
01
Technical
Uncertainty
The solution isn’t obvious in your context—there’s a real technical problem to solve.
02
Systematic Investigation
You test options through trials and iterations, form hypotheses, and measurement conclusions.
03
Technological Advancement
You can show measurable improvement beyond routine operations.
We help you capture:
You don’t need perfect paperwork. You need a consistent evidence trail.
What problem you were solving
[ uncertainty ]
What you changed vs. what stayed constant
[ variables ]
What you measured
[ results, comparisons ]
What changed based on results
[ decisions ]
Who worked on it and when
[ timeline ]
Link between trial work and eligible costs
[ high-level ]
Explore manufacturing sub-sectors
[ Sub-industry ]
Equipment & Machinery Manufacturing
Equipment-focused SR&ED is strongest when it documents iterative engineering, design constraints, performance targets, testing cycles, failed versions, and how decisions drove each change. We help differentiate routine redesign from true technological advancement supported by measurements and learning outcomes.
Industrial Automation
Automation SR&ED is most defensible when system integration challenges are framed as technological uncertainty, resolved through iterative testing—process constraints, performance bottlenecks, reliability, and validation results. We help structure the evidence so "integration work" doesn't read as routine implementation.
Manufacturing & Automation Overview
See how we help teams across the entire manufacturing sector secure SR&ED funding. From custom tooling to complex automation integrations, discover our end-to-end methodology.
Your R&D in
[
Manufacturing
]
Our expertise. Zero anxiety.
Why teams choose Checkpoint
Proven experience, defensible process, and clear accountability.
20
+
[ Years of experience ]
8500
+
[ Projects ]
$500M
+
[ Recovered ]
96.5
%
[ Success rate ]
[ Testimonials ]
[ Robotics & Mechatronics ]
“What set Checkpoint Research apart was their ability to speak our language fluently.
We didn't have to 'dumb down' our technical challenges in control systems or advanced mechanics; they understood the engineering immediately. This resulted in a streamlined filing process where the reports were a true, substantive reflection of our R&D."
Frequently Asked Questions
Structuring claims in [Pharmaceuticals]
We speak your technical language
We speak your technical language
What is the CRA’s "Why and How" framework?
The "Why and How" framework is the CRA’s current assessment standard, replacing the legacy "Five Questions." It strictly evaluates the technical impetus for your project (the 'Why') and the systematic rigor of your execution (the 'How').
read more
read more
What constitutes "contemporaneous documentation"?
Contemporaneous documentation refers to raw evidence generated during the execution of the work. Retroactive documentation drafted months after project completion is heavily scrutinized and frequently rejected by the CRA.
read more
read more
Which specific artifacts should our engineering team preserve?
Preserve time-stamped artifacts tied directly to technical roadblocks. Commit logs, Jira/Linear tickets, Slack threads detailing failed tests, architecture whiteboard photos, and granular timesheets are the gold standard of evidence.
read more
read more
What are the escalation protocols if a claim is denied?
The CRA provides a strict, three-tier escalation framework: an initial dispute resolution dialogue with the reviewer, an escalation to the Review Manager, and ultimately a formal Notice of Objection — filed within 90 days of assessment and, if required, carried to the Tax Court of Canada.
read more
read more
When is litigation in the Tax Court of Canada (TCC) necessary?
The TCC is the final arbiter, utilized only when internal CRA administrative appeals are exhausted. It provides an independent judicial review of your technical and financial eligibility, completely separate from the CRA's internal ecosystem.
read more
read more
Let’s Assess Your R&D Potential
Start with a pressure-free consultation.
We’ll clarify what likely qualifies, flag key risk areas, and recommend the safest next step based on your activities and timeline.
See what typically qualifies
See what typically qualifies
Direct line:
+1 (365) 525-2505
+1 (365) 525-2505
Prefer WhatsApp or email?
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.